Dr. Charles Murray, BA, Ph.D., Harvard, MIT — Includes UBER as part of a ‘Liberty Without Permission’


A Dr. Charles Murray, a libertarian political/social scientist famous for his controversial book ‘The Bell Curve’ discussed UBER as an example of a new order of Liberty in the fight against an over-regulated society.
Now, he just called taxi companies Monopolies [sic] when they are state-certified franchises. I mean, anyone can’t just open up a Subway . . . you first have to purchase a franchise from Subway, and you can’t build in someone else’s territory. What he did get right was what I put in my Legal Memorandum to Yellow Cab and their attorney, and as a follow up to Senator McSorley.
The popularity of UBER is what is driving the failure to enforce regulations, and there is legal precedent for a ‘state’ to ignore existing franchises in order to improve an industry. The REAL ISSUE in New Mexico, however, is that Call-A-Cab existed prior to Lyft and UBER, and not only had better logistics but did it legally, within the existing regulatory structure, and is more accessible than Lyft and UBER.
Look, those safety regulations came out of real life issues concerning drivers and taxi maintenance. Taxi drivers are vetted at a much higher level than UBER’s, and taxis are clearly marked and mechanically inspected, from top to bottom, every 4000 miles. Yes, a Taxicab may not be as immaculate as a personal car used by UBER, but that taxi is driven as many as 500 miles a day almost every day of the week. Each day, as many as 24 customers get in and out, track dirt and trash, smoke cigarettes . . . plus, the 4000 miles a week racking up on the odometer.
Yet, while drivers complain about dropping incomes and Yellow Cab spends 10’s of thousands in legal fees (and losing that amount monthly in lost taxi leases), both Yellow and drivers continue to ignore Call-A-Cab. Join, subscribe, learn the simple ‘in/out’ protocol on your Smartphone . . . get an Android phone on a separate business line if you are stuck with an iPhone, but with 25+ drivers on the map Call-A-Cab can beat UBER logistics. https://www.aei.org/scholar/charles-murray/


Wall Street Journal Article on UBER almost gets it right


June of 2014, a Wall Street Journal Article screamed in its headline, ‘Uber Shocks the Regulators.’

One paragraph in particular is worth citing, stating that:

Uber uses technology to create efficiency by enabling supply to match demand.

Okay, but is that entirely true? Yes, Uber uses GPS technology and a Smartphone App. However, that is not what is the key. What makes Uber more efficient is their contracting of illegal part-time drivers who do not have to commit to a 12-hour shift in a legal taxi.

GPS contributes the more efficient ‘proximity’ method of call dispatch distribution. However, without the fluid supply of almost unlimited drivers and cars, at no cost to Uber by the way, their system wouldn’t work.

No cost? Taxi companies are regulated for safety, NOT TO BLOCK COMPETITION. By using un-vetted drivers (no DOT exams, criminal background checks, drug tests, regular driver record submissions) and unregulated vehicles (no 4000-mile mechanical inspections, no markings, no commercial insurance, no on-spot mechanic or tow service), Uber saves a lot of money. Oh, and add the fact Uber collects nor pays gross receipts taxes . . .


But this blog is about Call-A-Cab, so time to get back to shameless self-promotion.

Four years ago, I struggled with how to meet peak demand, like large hotel checkouts or bar rush. I suggested Yellow Cab create a cadre’ of cab drivers who could be on-call to handle peak demand using their own vehicles. What kyboshed the plan was no underwriting for part-time commercial use of a personal vehicle.

Now, I had been using GPS attached to my Motorola Q (a cross between the Motorola Razor and a Blackberry) since 2006. So, 2012 I started researching taxi tracking by GPS and Smartphones and created the website https://taxiabq.com, Call-A-Cab. It was officially launched live August 6, 2013.

Call-A-Cab worked on the premise that Radio Dispatch worked fine during normal business, but when demand resulted in customers being put on hold the delays in service were unacceptable. With the proliferation of Smartphones, I felt customers could hang up and access the https://taxiabq.com URL and call the closest cab right off the GPS map.

This new efficiency would be a taxi picking a customer up in the time it would have taken them to wait on hold and a taxi finally dispatched! In other words, after waiting on hold seven minutes, giving pickup information to the operator, and the operator giving that information to a radio dispatcher, it could take ten minutes for a cab to finally start out on the way to the pickup. With Call-A-Cab, the customer would call the closest cab, give the pickup information in ten seconds, and the taxi would arrive in ten minutes.

Now, that sounds like Uber, doesn’t it? Well, because of direct phone contact with the taxi it is actually more efficient, and all of the taxis and taxi drivers are LEGAL! And, it launched in Albuquerque almost a year ahead of Lyft and Uber.

Now, Lyft and Uber want the government regulatory agencies to change the law to accommodate their business models. Well, I have news for them. They should have done it legally in the first place. Call-A-Cab did!